After the Yanks got shut down by a rookie yesterday, I decided to test my hypothesis that the Yanks crash and burn against starting pitchers they haven't seen before and excel against vets. Here are the results:
First off, I defined "rookie" as a pitcher who's had two or fewer 25+ start seasons. And I only looked at starting pitchers who got a "W" against the Yanks. As much as I hate pitcher W/L, it was the most straightforward metric to use.
By status:
- 18 rookies have beaten the Yanks.
- 23 veterans have beaten them.
- Opponents starting winning rookies have outscored the Yankees 143-49, for a run differential of 94.
- Opponents starting winning vets have outscored the Yankees 137-62, for a run differential of 75.
- Thus, contrary to how it may feel, the Yankees don't lose to new pitchers more than older ones, although they do score fewer runs in the situations overall.
- Teams currently above .500 have beaten us with rookies 11 times and with vets 11 times.
- Teams currently below .500 have beaten us with rookies 7 times and with vets 12 times.
- Thus, "bad" teams still have better success against the Yankees when they start someone with experience.
- Above .500 teams have outscored the Yanks 154-61, with means a differential of 93. When they start rookies, they outscore them 89-31, which makes the difference 58.
- Below .500 teams outscored the Yanks 126-50, with means a differential of 76. When they start rookies, they outscore them 54-18, for a difference of 36.
- Thus, the Yankees still lose harder against better teams.